New Jersey to Consider Animal Cruelty as a Lifelong ‘Conviction’-Guilty or Not!!

Maybe this will get people to pay attention to the ramifications imposed on people falsely accused of animal cruelty as the Animal Rights Extremists are attempting to forge ahead with more laws that make the lives of animals more important than people. The new proposed New Jersey law applies to both criminal and civil charges/procedures even thou a person can loose their animals thru civil procedure and never convicted of any crime.

Now consider the reality of what this really means…A person who is charged with a crime against their PROPERTY can then be punished the rest of their lives, even if there was no criminal conviction and an agreement was made to give up that PROPERTY; grouped together with people convicted of animal cruelty-REALLY?!? Come on-that makes little to no sense. Then again, unless you have been charged or know someone who has been charged then you have little to no idea how anyone/everyone is accused are framed-yes, I said framed to take a fall and reason so few people able to escape the court and the charges with their animals. If this bill were to become law the costs for prosecuting someone for animal cruelty will go up as it will affect the rest of their lives and he courts will be more jammed up than they already are with real criminals and appeals with people fighting for more than the return of their property.

Just how can everyone who is accused of animal cruelty be grouped together, whether intentional or not, misdemeanor for a not violent crime or a felony (non-violent v violent crime for animal cruelty is also at question here) as if any cruelty actually existed at all or if it was made up as they proceeded. This New Jersey bill grouping both civil forfeiture and criminal convictions, misdemeanors and felonies together would have to be considered both illegal and unconstitutional as it affects ones ability to make a living and their ability to provide. This bill is a direct abuse of civil liberty but demonstrates the mindset of the Animal Rights Extremist attitude and true agenda.

Illegal general warrants do not satisfy the conditions for applying for a warrant, yet done all the time, with no one paying attention and most certainly not a court appointed attorney when it should be the first thing addressed-the most important thing to the case. What was the cause provided to the judge for issuing the search warrant and exactly what was to be taken-most certainly which animal is the reason for there to be cruelty charges. Was it a conclusion or a cause for the action. Warrants lacking probable cause are granted and used all the time-Judges in the lower courts are usually laymen non-lawyers who might not know the difference or even concern themselves-some even figure if law enforcement asks for a warrant than there must be reason to grant it. Thus, the court battle that ensues is like no other when appearing before the same judge who issued that warrant.

What appears like a slam dunk against the owner is actually an “in rem” proceeding and not against anyone-judged on the condition of the property. So, without cause to have taken a single animal thus less all the animals and without a jury but the judge who issued the warrant;  the proceeding takes place and animals are then ‘awarded’ to some NFP organization who had just stated in court that the animals were abused yet, shortly after receiving the animals, they are up for sale as “Retail Rescue Pets” unless there is an appeal. None of which is actual proper procedure from the start, people loosing their property and more often then not, there are no criminal charges.

The purpose of an original proceeding is to decide the condition of the animals and if the animals are to be held until after a criminal trial holding the owner or caregiver (or both) responsible for the condition of the property. An “in rem” proceeding has nothing to do with awarding anyone any animal…it is strictly to determine the condition at the time of the taking. And most certainly has nothing to do with guilt of a crime yet they want to hold civil forfeiture against people-Seriously!?!

The good news: “As written, Moose’s Law is unenforceable, unreasonable, and almost certainly doomed to fail.”

http://animallaw.foxrothschild.com/2014/01/23/required-certification-to-work-with-animals-in-new-jersey/

Coming Soon: Certification Required To Work With Animals In New Jersey

Legislators plan to re-introduce Moose’s Law in New Jersey’s new legislative session, despite Governor Christie’s pocket veto of the bill.  The law would prohibit anyone from working with animals in New Jersey, unless the Department of Health (“DOH”) certifies that each employee (volunteer or paid) never violated any part of New Jersey’s animal cruelty statute, or committed any similar violations in other states.  The logistics and cost of these investigations have never been addressed, and it is not clear if the information required for review is readily available, can be obtained within the time frame proscribed in the bill, or will actually protect animals from abuse.  However, anyone who is not certified is barred from employment which involves contact with animals in New Jersey.

Additionally, the employment bar is permanent, and mandatory, upon a finding of criminal or civil liability of any provision of the animal cruelty statute.  The type of businesses that will be affected by these new employment restrictions include:

  • Pet stores
  • Animal Shelters and Rescues
  • Farms with animals-dairy, beef, chickens, ducks, swine, fish, llama, etc.
  • Horse barns, stables, racing facilities, including those run by the State of New Jersey
  • Veterinary hospitals
  • Animal breeders, kennels, doggie day care facilities
  • Slaughterhouses
  • Livestock haulers
  • Live bird markets
  • Auctions
  • Zoos and aquaria
  • State and federal officials who work with animals
  • Research facilities
  • Schools with animals in the classroom
  • Animal trainers and groomers
  • Farriers

Everyone currently working at these facilities would have to be cleared by the Department of Health before they are permitted to retain their employment.  Any new employees cannot work directly with animals, unsupervised, until the DOH provides the certification.

In addition to concerns about this bill that were previously addressed, some of the outstanding legal issues and unintended consequences of this bill include:

  • Due process concerns for individuals who previously pled guilty to animal cruelty charges, or agreed to pay a civil penalty instead of pursuing legal defenses.  Barring these individuals from employment in any animal-related enterprise, after the fact, is not only unfair, but violates their constitutional rights.

 

  • Criminal violators may be able to expunge their records, and, once expunged, the bar to employment with animals could be reversed.  Compare that with an individual who violated a similar provision of the statute, but was only found civilly liable.  That individual would not have the ability to expunge their record.  Not only is that result nonsensical, defendants may be inclined to reject the ability to plea to a lesser civil charge, because of this permanent punishment.  Criminal charges require proof beyond a reasonable doubt, instead of merely a preponderance of the evidence.  Therefore, these cases would consume considerably greater prosecutorial and judicial resources than they currently require.

 

  • Veterinarians, licensed by the State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners, could have their license revoked without any review by the licensing board, and their professional career permanently terminated.

 

  • Other business owners could face similar draconian results, with no recourse seemingly available, once found criminally or civilly liable.  Recent amendments to the cruelty statute added negligence as a statutory violation.  Therefore, even unintentional acts could result in a permanent bar to one’s chosen field of work.

The mandatory bar to employment in the re-introduced bill should be amended to permit a judge to consider whether such a bar is reasonable, on a temporary or permanent basis, based on the facts of each case.

To be clear, there are situations where a violator should be banned from working with animals, for a proscribed or permanent period of time. However, that determination should be left to the trier of fact.

It is unfortunate that the suffering endured by Moose is not better memorialized by a law that could actually prevent the cruelty he was exposed to.  As written, Moose’s Law is unenforceable, unreasonable, and almost certainly doomed to fail.

__________________________

Disclaimer connected to this blog…Things said are of my opinion and the opinions of others…Stay tuned  -B

Advertisements

~ by topcatsroar on May 23, 2014.

5 Responses to “New Jersey to Consider Animal Cruelty as a Lifelong ‘Conviction’-Guilty or Not!!”

  1. Good job, TOP CAT! Great blog!

  2. THIS WAS A VERY GOOD ARTICLE, THAT I’M ALSO FIGHTING FEDERAL. THEY HAVE TOTALLY RAIL ROAD ME INTO THE SYSTEM WITH ZERO EVIDENCE OF ANYTHING.
    DEC. 27 2005 I GOT 26 VIOLATIONS OF MY WOLVES & WOLFHYBRIDS NOT HAVING VACCS.
    ————————————
    1. WOLFHYBRIDS NOR WOLVES GET VACCS EXCEMPTED FROM THE COUNTY ORIDENCE . OVIOUSLY THEY DON’T PAY ATTENTION TO THEIR OWN LAWS.
    2.THEY WERENT DUE TILL JAN 1 2006 AS SPOKEN CLEARLY ON THE COUNTY ORDIANCES.
    3. PLUS ANIMALS UNDER 4 MONTHS DONT GET THEM EITHER OR TILL THEIR OF AGE.
    —————————————
    MARCH 9TH 2006 THEY ATTACT ME AGAIN, WHILE JUST OPENING A WILD RESCUE BY LINDA CHRISTIAN JAN 2006, NEEDING ANIMALS FOR HER LIL RESCUE.
    MARCH 9 TH 2006, TRESPASSING NO WARRANT, STEALING 13 (THEY MISS COUNT AS USUAL THEY CLAIM 10, )HEALTHY PUPS. JUST IN MY PHOTOS, YOU CAN SEE SOLID PUPS THAT NO BONES WERE SHOWING, TONGUES RED SHOWING THEY WERE HEALTHY NO WORMS, NO FLEAS,NO MANGE, NO NOTHING. THEY STEAL THEM, POST THEM ON THE FLORIDA LUPINE ASSOC FOR $5,000.00 EACH. HMMMM. FOR SICKLY ANIMALS AS THEY CLAIMED WHICH WAS A LINE OF BULLSHIT, HOW CAN THEY BE SELLING THEM SECRETLY ON THE SIDE TO PROFIT OVER. IN WHICH MELISSA KONDRATICK LIVES BEHIND ME WAS RUNNING THE ASSOC.GO TO SEARCH ENGINES, PUT FLORIDA LUPINE ASSOC 2006 IN SEARCH.PHOTOS OF GARAGE STOCKED WITH FOOD.WELL TAKEN CARE OF AND LOVED.
    —————————————-
    I GET A CALL THE MILLIONAIRE BEHIND ME WANTS MY LAND CAUSE THERES NO EASEMENT TOO HIS LAND BUT THREW MY YARD. EVERY OTHER PROPERTY THAT BOARDERED HIS HAD A CLIFF BEHIND IT, BUT MINE.SO NOW WE NO MOTIVE PLUS SECRETLY PROFITING OVER EXSPENSIVE ANIMALS.
    ——————————————
    MARCH 25 TH 2006
    FRAUD VET REPORT, HAD NO VETS SIGNATURE, NO PROOF OF ANYTHING. PICTURES OF SOME ONE ELSES ANIMALS AND HORSE. THE JUDGE SCAGLIONI STATES TAKE THE REST OF MY ANIMALS MY HRSE TOO WITH OUT A RIB SHOWING,WHILE I PROVED MY PUPS WERE DEWORMED, STRIKES THEIR BULLSHIT, THEY HAD ALL THERE TAGS, THEY HAD VET APPOINTMENTS NOT OF AGE YET TO GET CERTAIN SHOTS,TRYN TO MAKE ‘ME LOOK CRUEL’ THEY COME OUT AND SHOOT ALL MY 29 ANIMALS.FOR NO REASON AT ALL.I THOUGHT I WAS GOING TO DIE THAT DAY. NO DART GUN. SHOT GUN!

    PUTTING A APPEAL IN TO TRY TO SAVE THEM, BUY THEM TIME.. THE 5TH CIRCUIT JUDGE MERRIT SR, WOULDNT LOOK AT MY APPEAL STATING IT WASN’T DONE BY A ATTY. THEY JUST ROBBED YA BLIND.
    I PUT MY FIRST FEDERAL CASE INTO DISTRIC COURT OF TAMPA,FL.
    IT FAILED CAUSE THE FINAL JUDGEMENT WAS SENT TO THE WRONG ADDRESS I GOT FINALLY ON THE 29TH DAY, I HAD TO ANSWER BY 30TH DAY. AFTER EXSPLAINING THE FAULT WITH IN THE SYSTEM, WRONG ADDRESS, I LOST THAT CASE. I WAS SUING FOR 11 MILLION DOLLARS.
    ——————————————————
    SEPT 2 2007 MY MOTHER IN MY HOME AFTER SURGURY WITH A ROD PUT IN HER HIP AND LEG, DEFF IN A RECLINER AS I TOOK MY DAUGHTER TO A FRIENDS HOUSE. A.C. AND DEPUTYS BROKE INTO MY HOME, TOOK THE TWO THE JUDGE SAID I COULD HAVE, CHASED OUT SIDE, MY MOM HOLDING A CARD FROM A.C. JOHN TOSSANO. FRONT DOOR AND GARGE DOOR WIDE OPEN AS I PULLED UP, WITH CHICKENS PLANTED IN MY YARD TO INTISE MY ANIMALS OUT OF MY HOME.ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZER. I FIGHT THAT IN COURT. THEM NEVER GIVING ME A TICKET NOR COURT APPEARANCE.. I WAS FUMING OVER THE CORRUPTION.MY NAME LEFT OFF THE DOCIT, I GET A 1 DAY NOTICE TO APPEAR IN COURT. BEFORE COURT HOUSE OPENS. JUDGE SCAGLIONI STATES WE HAVE HER NOW SO SHES PROPERTY ON HERNANNDO COUNTY. I LOST IN COURT. NO TICKETS, NO NOTHING.CORRUPT SYSTEM AGAIN.
    ———————————————————
    SO I GO OUT AND BUY 2 SIBERIAN HUSKIES.THINKING THE COURT SYSTEM SAID I CAN HAVE TWO ANIMALS.
    SEPT 28TH 2010. 3 YEARS ITS BEEN QUIET, THE INSIGATOR NEIGHBORS DESIDE TO RUN, I HAD A LOT EVIDENCE AGAINST THEM IN ACTS THAT THEY’VE DONE POISENING ANIMALS, STEALING THEM, TARING FENCES DOWN, SETTING THEM LOOSE.
    OK, NOW A LADY COMES TO MY HOUSE, STATES MY ANIMALS ATTACKED HER SHEEP. WHAT SHEEP??? I NEVER SEEN SHEEP AROUND HERE.I TOLD HER MY ANIMALS WERE IN MY HOME IN AIR CONDITIONING.I ASKED HER IF THEY WERE KILLED OR HURT, HER REPLY WAS” I DONT KNOW, I HAVE TO PICK MY DAUGHT UP AT SCHOOL” I LOOKED AT TANYA, SAID LETS GO FIND THIS LADY, I HAVE MEDS THAT WILL STOP THE BLEEDING PRONTO TRYN TO BE NICE. WE FOUND THE CAR THAT CAME HERE. KNOCKED ON FRONT DOOR NO ANSWER, AT THE SIDE OF THE HOUSE, LOOKED OUT BACK THINKING THEY MUST BE TENDING OUT BACK WITH THE SHEEP. THEY WAS NO SHEEP. THE LADY COMES OUT, IM STANDING THERE WONDERING WHATS GOING ON! NO SHEEP FOUND BY ANY NEIGHBOR. NO SIGN OF ANIMAL SHEEP OUT OF HER YARD.ON THE REPORT IT STATES MARCH 25 TH 2006 WHEN A.C. BRENDA ROGERS TOOK MY PUPS MARCH 9TH 2006, JUDGE ONLY STATING I COULD HAVE 2 DOGS, WRITES ON THE REPORT I HAD PUPPIES. IN THAT CASE, NOR DEPUTYS NOR A.C. EVER CAME TO MY HOME TO DOCUMENT SHIT. IF I HAD PUPPIES LIKE SHE STATED IN GOV FRAUD REPORT, SHE WOULD OF TAKEN THEM.PROVES MORE LIES.

    SHE WRITES A REPORT FILLED WITH LIES. STATING I HAD 3 WOLVES, NOT, I HAD 2 HUSKIES, STATED I HARRASS HER ALL THE TIME, LIE, I NEVER KNEW THE PSYCHOPATH, TRYN TO RUIN MY CHARACTOR, OK, I GO INTO COURT DEC 13 2010, THE JUDGE HITZMANN IN MY FAVOR BECAUSE THEY COULDNT IDENTIFY MY ANIMALS, OR WHAT COLOR THEY WERE , THE JUDGED DENIED THEM 3 TIMES.
    ——————————————————————
    JAN 2010 COUNTY COMMISSIONER JAMES ADKINS TAKES DENNIS, JAMES, RON AND MYSELF TO LUNCH AT APPLE BEEZ. IM SHOWING THE COMMISSIONER ALL THE CORRUPTION THE COUNTY ATTY JON JOUBENS BEEN DOING. HE’S REPLY SHOCKED OVER WHAT HE’S SEEN, STATES ILL FIRE JOUBEN, BUT I HAVE TO FIRE THE ATTY OVER HIM COLLER SO HE WONT PROTECT JOUBEN.LIE.
    JAMES ADKINS AND I TALLKED ALL THE TIME ON HIS HOUSE PHONE THAT WAS A FRIEND,HELPED ME WITH THE FEMA PROGRAM
    ———————————————————————-
    OK, I GET IN THE NEWSPAPERS, TOTALLY BULLSHIT STORY, SLEEPING IN BED WOKEN UP BY HERNANDO COUNTY RESIDENCE, KNOWING THE CORRUPTION THE COUNTYS DONE AGAINST ME, CALLS ME UP STATING PUT CHAINS ON YOUR GATES AND LOCKS. I ASKED WHY. IN HERNANDO TODAY, THERE WAS A BULLSHIT STORY STATING MY ANIMALS ATTACKED SHEEP. HOUNDS OF BROOKSVILLE,FL.. HOW DARE YOU LIE ABOUT ME!AND MY ANIMALS TO FRAME US.

    MARCH 13? 2011 DRAGGED INTO COURT, NEVER KNOWING WHY IM GOING TO COURT, NEVER GIVEN DEFENCE, NEVER MY EVIDENCE ENTERED INTO RECORDS, 3 COUNTY ATTYS AGAINST ME.WOW,,,, I TOLD THE JUDGE TOMBRINK, YOU CAN;’T DO THIS, THIS IS DBLE JEOPERDIE, HE STATED YES I CAN. DEPUTY KRAMER GETS ON THE WITNES STAND, STATES I HAD 2 LARGE WOLVES, PURJURIED HIMSELF.JUDGE ORDERS I CAN ONLY HAVE TWO DOGS UNDER 20 LBS. WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT SHIT! SO I GAVE THEM TO MY DAUGHTER TO WATCH. OUT SIDE IN THE HEAT, THEY STOPPED EATTING GOT DEPRESSED WANTING TO COME HOME. SO I SEEN THE WEIGHT LOSS, I SEEN THEY ALWAYS HAD FOOD, REFUSING TO EAT. SO I THOUGHT TO MYSELF, WHY ARE WE BEING PUNISHED FOR CRAP WE NEVER DID, SO I DIDNT WANT MY ANIMALS SUFFERING , I TOOK THEM HOME! CRAZY BEING IN TROUBLE FOR LOVING AND TAKING EXCELLANT CARE OF YOUR ANIMALS!
    ————————————–
    MAY 20 2011 MY PLACE WAS SET ON FIRE. FRAUD FIREMARCHELL REPORT. I LOST MY RV AND EVERYTHING I HAD PACKED IN IT, READY TO LEAVE HERE THAT 10TH DAY.MY TRUCK, RV, WAS BURNED TO THE GROUND. MY FIREBIRD, MY CAMERO , MY HOME ON FIRE. MY TRAILER I HAD 50 PCS TO GIVE TO CHILDREN AT REZS ON FIRE. EVERYTHING BURNED TO THE GROUND.THE COUNTY ATTY POST IN FACEBOOK, I NEED DESPERATLY TO FIND A NEW JOB. ALSO QUOTES HES DRUNK, ALSO QUOTES THE WOLF LADYS CRAZY. 2 DAYS AFTER THE FIRE.
    SO DEPUTYS WERE SNEAKING HERE WITH ANIMAL CONTROL EVERY NIGHT. ID FIND TRACK MARKS, CIG BUTTS, ETC. I KNEW THEY WERE OUT HERE. SO TO PROTECT MYSELF, BECAUSE MY HUSKIES WERE NOT AGGRESSIVE, THEY’D LOOK, BUT WOULDNT BARK TO ALLERT ME, SO I GOT TWO SHEPHERD PUPS. AGGRESSIVELY BARKING AT NIGHT AT THE CORNER OF THE FENCES. I KNEW SOME ONE WAS HERE CAUSE THEY GET BURS ON THEM, THAT WAS ALONG THE BOARDS, TO DBLE FENCED WHERE YA COULDNT MOW.NORMALLY THEYD NEVER GO NEAR THE FENCE LINE.
    ——————————————
    FEB 20 2013 AT 2;57 AM SMOKE IN MY HOME. I TYPE A EMAIL TO A FRIEND STATING IM CHOKING AND I DONT NO WHY. I TURNED LIGHT ON, PLACE FILLED WITH SMOKE FORGETING SOMETHING ON THE STOVE. I EMEDIANTLY TOOK MY ANIMALS OUT FRONT, CHAIN LINK ENCLOSED.SAT ON MY LAP TOP, AIRING THE HOUSE OUT. 3;30 AM, I BRING THE ANIMALS BACK IN. THEY RUN THREW THE HALLWAY TO THE BACK ROOM.
    4 ;00 THERE CLOCKED INTO ANIMAL CONTROL. HMMMM. THAT LEFT THEM 10 MINUTES TO STEAL AND LOAD THEM 20 MINUTE RIDE TO A.C. IN WHICH A WITNESS SEEN MY ANIMALS IN THE TRUCK AT THAT TIME AT CLOVER LEAF STOP SIGN.
    ON THE REPORT, IT STATES MY NEIGHBOR STATED THEY ALWAYS GOT OUT. I TALKED TO MY NEW NEIGHBORS AND THEY STATED THATS NOT TRUE, WE NEVER TALKED TO ANYONE. SEEMS LOGICAL BECAUSE AT 4 AM, WHO GOING TO BE UP?SO YES THEY DO ADD NEIGHBORS TO A REPORT TO SOUND LIKE THESE PIGS HAVE MORE BACK UP.
    AS YOU CAN VIEW ON THIS PAGE http://www.Lookingthruwolfeyes.com/47.html
    you will notice a few things.
    1.THERE NOT EVEN LISTED AS HYBRIDS. NO WOLVES ON THAT PAGE.
    2. THEY CLAIMED THEY WERE BOOKOO MILES AWAY CHASING HORSES. AT 4 AM, COME ON, YOU COULDNT THINK OF A BETTER LIE THEN THAT!
    3. SO YOU GOT KRAMMER IN A LIE UNDER OATH. A SHERIFF THATS KEEPING CRIMINALS ON PAY CHECK.KNOWING HE LIED.
    4. YOU GOT A FRESH HUGE HAND PRINT OF SOMEONE INSIDE MY HOUSE, THAT PROVES ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZER THE SHERIFF IGNORS.
    5. YOU GOT A KICKED IN FENCE, THAT NO DOGS CHEWED OR SCRATCHED OUT. MORE LIES.I HAD TWO INVESTIGATERS OUT HERE AND A PRESIDENT OF A WOLF ASSOC. ALL 3 CLAIMED NO ANIMAL DID THIS TO MY FENCE.THEY WALKED MY FENCE LINES, NOT ONE DIG HOLE DID THEY EVER TRY TO EXCAPE. AND THAT THE HAND PRINT AND FINGER PRINTS WERE VERY CLEAR FOR THEM TO OF PULLED TO FIND OUT WHO WAS INSIDE MY HOUSE AND STOLE MY ANIMALS.
    ————————————————

    COUNTY COMMISSIONER JAMES ADKINS LIES ON THE REPORT ON SWORN STATEMENT SAYS HE NEVER TALKED TO ME TILL FEB 20 2013.
    —————————————————-
    MS BLAKE STATES ON REPORT MY ANIMALS WERE VERY FRIENDLY, RECORDS WEIGHT. SHAWNEE WAS A RUNT,, PROBABLY WEIGHED 35 LBS.FAR CRY FROM 2 LARGE WOLVES! THE OTHERS ONLY BEING 7 MONTHS OLD, 45 PURE BRED SHEPHERDS.I HAVE THE PAPER WORK ON THEM. PUPS. NOT FULL GROWN.
    MY ANIMALS WERE HIDDEN IN BACK, SO YTHEY COULD STEAL THEM WITH OUT ANYONE SEEING THEM.
    I WENT ASKED FOR RECORDS ‘WHO BROUGHT THEM IN’ THEY REFUSED TO GIVE ME RECORDS, SO THEN THEY HAD DEPUTYS BANG ON MY FRONT DOOR GIVING ME A NO TRESPASSING SO I COULDNT GET RECORDS. BUT I KNEW SOME ONE THAT GOT THEM. A.C. BRENDA ROGERS AGAIN WAS OUT HERE STEALING ANIMALS.
    AGAIN OUR SHERIFF KNOWINGLY THE CORRUPTION IGNORS IT ALL KEEPS THEM CRIMINALS ON PAY ROLL.

    NOW. SINCE IVE SHOWN THE SHERIFF Nienhuis, Al, ANEINHUIS@HERNANDOSHERIFF.ORG TO RESIGN!
    ALL THERE LYERS COUND NOT SYNCRINIZE THEIR LIES TO CORRISPOND WITH EACH OTHER.

    AL NEINHUIS STATED NONE OF OUR DEPUTYS CAME OUT IN 2013. LIE, LIE ,LIE.
    YOU TOOK A OATH, YOUR VIOLATING THAT OATH, YOU ARE SUPPOSE TO BE WORKING FOR ‘WE THE PEOPLE” YOU ARE A LYER! YOU ARE COVERING UP CRIME WITHIN YOUR OFFICE. YOU ARE VIOLATING ILLEGAL SEARCH A SEIZER, CIVIL RIGHTS, DU PROCESS, 933.20 NO INSPECTION WARRANT, ANIMAL ENTER PRIZE. MISS LEADING A JUDGE! LIST GOES ON AND ON.

    AL NEINHUIS I LIKE YOU PERSONALLY, BUT YOU ARE A ROTTEN SHERIFF AND DON;’T DO YOUR JOB TO PRPOTECT WE THE PEOPLE, YOU NEED TO RESIGN.
    >>> http://WWW.LOOKINGTHRUWOLFEYES.COM <<<
    FACEBOOK' SHAWNEE.NIKI (Lookingthruwolfeyes)

    AGAIN I HAVE A FEDERAL LAWSUIT AGAINST HERNANDO COUNTY IN FLORIDA DISTRIC COURT.

    • Phone number removed but anyone can make contact with you thru your FB or website…You have well documented what has happened to you and your animals I just can’t figure why you remain there as a target…but we all have reasons for what we do or what we think is best. Wishing you luck with your case.

  3. I REMAIN HERE, BECAUSE ITS BEEN A FIGHT FOR MY LAND. IN ORDER TO SUCCESSFULLY RUN ME OUT, THEY HAD TO REMOVE MY ANIMALS AS A REASON, LOGICAL REASON TO OF STAYED. LOOK, THE GOV RAN NATIVE AMERICANS OFF THEIR LAND FOR CENTURYS. THE GOVERNMENT SEEMS TO THINK THEY CAN RUN ANY ONE OFF THERE LAND STEAL THEIR PROPERTY. I ENGAGED IN A HUMUNGOUS FIGHT FOR MY CHILDREN, MY ANIMALS AND MY PROPERTY AND MYSELF.THE GOVERNMENT CAN’T KEEP CRIMINALIZING INNOCENT PEOPLE. WE HAVE A SHERIFF THAT COVERS FOR HIS CORRUPT DEPUTYS, AND SMILES WITH HIS BABY FACE ON NEWS, AND PRETENDS TO BE THIS RIGHTOUS MAN THAT THEY MAKE UP THE LAWS AS THEY GO FOR YEARS! WHATS AGAINST THE LAW WALKING DOWN THE STREET LOOKING FOR YOUR MAILBOX NEIGHBORS STOLE. NOT A FKING THING. WHAT IS AGAINST THE LAW POSTING A SIGN IN FRONT OF YOUR HOME. NOT A FKN THING.THESE ARE TACTICS THEY HAVE BEEN DOING TO ME AND THE PEOPLE HERE.JUDGES SHOULD BE IN JAIL.DBLE JEOPERDIZING ME WHEN ME AND MY ANIMALS WERE FOUND INNOCENT.READ MY LIPS, LISTEN CLOSE. WE DONT GET HELP. THEY KNOW IT. NO ATTORNEY TAKES ON THESE KINDS OF CASES, ONCE THEY HEAR THE CRAP THEY DUMPED ON YOUR RECORD THATS FRAUD, YOU DONT NEVER GET HELP.I KNOW THERE TACTICS.I KNOW THERE LIL TRICKS.ITS LIKE READING A BOOK.THEY TRY MAKING PEOPLE LOOK NUTS, WHEN THERE THE ONES THAT ARE NUTS.THEY MAKE IT TO WHERE KNOW ONE LISTENS AND CONTINUES TO DESTROY YOUR CHARACTER. YOU CAN DO 2 THINGS.GO INTO FEDERAL COURT, IN WHICH IVE DONE, FIGHT THEM, AND I CAN HELP PEOPLE WITH IF THATS WHAT THEY WISH TO DO FOR FREE. OR WRITE A BOOK OR TWO, SHOWING THE CORRUPTION, TRASHING THEIR NAMES. WHY NOT. THEY TRASH YOURS OVER LIES/ I WROTE 32 BOOKS.THEY ARE SELLING.YOU HAVE NO IDEA THE TRAMA THESE PEOPLE PUT ME THROUGH. IF I MOVE, IM NOT SELLING THIS HOME. THERE NOT WINNING THIS BATTLE. THIS LAND IS THE ONLY LAND THAT GOES INTO THE 80 ACRES BEHIND ME THE COUNTY WANTED A DEVELOPEMENT IN.TO MAKE BIG BUCKS. TO BAD, I WASNT THE ONE STUPID ENOUGH TO BUY LAND LOCKED PROPERTY. WE WERE HERE FIRST!FOR THE MOST PART, I RAN THEM OUT!

    • Your fight is really not alone, the federal courts are full of these cases now and ours in federal appeals court at present. I can’t believe we’ve had to go that far over basic constitutional rights!!! They denied a deaf man an ASL interpreter for crying out loud!!! And couldn’t be in the courts they put it in-no way the judges had jurisdiction!!! THREE days of warrantless searches can not ever be justified…Denied a jury trial-Sorry, not buying it that any of it was legal.
      I do get that the case is complicated but I don’t get that a federal judge didn’t understand how they broke the law and then he did the same thing by granting summary judgment without a hearing and didn’t pass the test that allows for summary judgment-We asked for a jury trial and expect nothing less than that-No longer about the animal cruelty they claimed we did but about their actions as illegal and unconstitutional…We loose the appeal, then there is no justice-period. No jury would ever allow all the violations they committed against us. We wait for an answer from the court. -B

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: