HSUS Invading the Environment~

from HumaneWatch

http://www.humanewatch.org/is-hsus-bad-for-the-environment/

Is HSUS Bad for the Environment?

The US has 100 times more deer today than it did 100 years ago. That’s a good thing, whether you like wildlife watching or enjoy venison, but it has brought challenges, such as deer-car collisions, which damage property and can even kill people. But another challenge is environmental.

All those deer eat vegetation—3,000 pounds a year per animal. This can have a detrimental effect on the flora, as Al Cambrone writes in The Wall Street Journal, and the fauna—more deer means fewer songbirds.

What to do about the exploding deer population? Wildlife expert Jim Sterba details in his book “Nature Wars” how wildlife management draws the concerns of many different parties, and even draws odd political alliances, as localities try to figure out what to do. Bow hunting and private sharpshooters are two options, with the meat being donated to local food banks, though killing deer certainly has detractors. Instead of complaining, though, they do offer an alternative.

Animal rights groups ideologically opposed to hunting, such as the Humane Society of the United States, have proposed deer “birth control” as a “humane” means of dealing with deer overpopulation. Cambrone, however, points out the impracticality of HSUS’s preferred (and seemingly only) way of managing deer:

Some environmentalists, especially in urban areas, oppose hunting to cull the herds and argue instead for deer “birth control.” Yet contrary to persistent urban legend, there’s no handy oral deer contraceptive we can slip into a pile of acorns. Nor is there a permanent contraceptive that can be delivered with a single shot from a dart gun. Currently available immunocontraceptive agents have no effect on 10%-15% of the treated does. Even when they’re effective the first year, booster shots are needed in subsequent years.

Then, too, it’s difficult to inject enough does in a large, free-roaming population—and more difficult still to inject each one repeatedly, right on schedule. Even if we could, all those deer would still be present for years—still eating, still wandering out into traffic, and every day welcoming their fertile new friends arriving from nearby. The most optimistic cost estimates for each injection are around $500 per deer. Even surgical sterilization has been tried in a few locales. Although it costs over $1,000 per deer, it is 100% reliable and permanent.

That’s a significant cost to taxpayers. In D.C.’s Rock Creek Park, for instance, HSUS wanted taxpayers to foot half the bill of deer birth control to the tune of $340,000. (The National Park Service was against HSUS’s proposal.) HSUS offered to chip in the other half, but for a group with $20 million-plus in Caribbean hedge funds, HSUS really should have offered to fund the whole experiment.

That’s just one park in one city. Imagine HSUS’s proposal for 30 million deer, and you get the idea why these proposals sound great, and may well work in isolated spots like islands or fenced-in areas, but can’t be taken seriously as national or local policy. Just ask the folks in Hastings-on-Hudson, NY—they’ve managed to tag only 8 deer. Consider the deer, but also consider the deer’s effects on flora and fauna.

________________________

Doesn’t make sense to give the deer birth control just to stop people from hunting and eating them which is actually the goal here. But then again the new requirement for egg production and birthing pigs coming from an EXTREMIST NFP organization working it’s way into state and federal government to control animal usage doesn’t either. None of the HSUS methods of control should be up for consideration without scientific information to back it up.

If you wanted someone to train your dog for you would you ask someone who has never owned a dog and will base his training on what h gets of the Internet?!? Of course not…The legislature all around the country are bought and paid additionally by lobbyist from HSS, PETA< ASPCA< and other extremists organizations…again doesn’t make much considering that the taxpayer put them in office to begin with and pays the bulk of his salary…Legislatures are elected to protect US citizens-not animals-HELLO!!!

Why isn’t anyone considering that the climate change that effects us will effect the wildlife. We need that wildlife and has been controlled through good solid conservation for years that changes with the need by the population of these animals. I have yet to meet a hunter who wouldn’t like to be able to take more than he’s currently allowed-simple basic economics can easily control the population of these animals-GIVE ME A BREAK!!!

Agenda 21 gave rights to these extremist organizations, Maurice Strong is a board member of HSUS-The impossible becomes possible!!!

Disclaimer connected to this blog…Things said are of my opinion and the opinions of others…Stay tuned  -B

Get sane…Re-Think Humane!!!

 

Advertisements

~ by topcatsroar on April 13, 2014.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: