The Justice of the Peace Forges his Own Brand of Law in Texas

animal seizures and rescues are being conducted by a

very sophisticated network of 

organized crime who have developed 

a very sophisticated scheme by which they are 

criminalizing longstanding animal and livestock owners;

divesting them of

ownership of entire herds of livestock and commercially

valuable animals.

all of it done at taxpayer expense and thru a highly

developed scheme to collect donations…

please follow the animals…follow the money!!!

_____________________________________________________

Many of you reading this blog might not believe the unbelievable but there’s no way to ignore the truth.

This has been studied over and over again but to no avail…you enter the court room with or without an attorney and try to speak applicable laws that effect your case and you aren’t herd. You go back over these laws that regulate the JP Judge and try to wrap your brain around the truth of the matter…If a JP Judge issued a warrant for ANY search and seize he is out of his jurisdiction; the warrant is invalid and must be vacated. Giving rise that there have been so many animals stolen from longstanding animal owners; the taxpayer flipping the bill, the media sensationalizing their stories, the hate perpetrated on the victims from an invalid warrant written by a JP Judge; we must put the judicial system on notice and make the legislators aware of this injustice that has gone on for years.

Of recent, I have become acquainted with a brilliant lady who was able to put all this together as we worked together as pro se litigants on civil cases concerning animal seizure. The law as written can not be applied and as taxpayers we need to demand justice for all, no matter the cost, it is to prevail, and already cost the taxpayers of Texas millions. Any wrongful animal seizure costs your community…This abuse of US citizens must stop.

In Texas, the JP Judge is NOT allowed to issue search warrants when there is a licensed judge in the district!!!  Counties in Texas have at least one District Judge who must be a licensed attorney within the state of Texas. Simple truth…JP Judge can not be involved in Class A misdemeanors or Felony cases…No different than any other type of case so why did they decide to do what they can’t!!! IMPOSSIBLE-read on!!!

The JP Judge is NOT allowed to preside over Class A misdemeanors or over property valued greater than $10,000.00. How many JP Judges have issued warrants to search and seize animals in the state of Texas illegally, and with no reference to any particular animal, vague in context; stating ‘all animals alive, dead and unborn’.

How many longstanding animal owners have been abused by the 821 animal cruelty law that we KNOW is illegal as written and applied as no regulation is above the codified law  of both the US and State constitution.

If you live in Texas and tire of your taxpayer money being used for these illegal animal seizures then you will want to forward to your legislators the following letter. It’ easy to do…go here and search out your legislator both from the senate and the house:

For the House of Representatives you go here:
For the Senate you go here:
Share this message far and wide with groups that are fighting against wrongful animal seizures and ask for them to share…And then start looking into the animal seizure regulation within your state if you don’t live in the state of Texas. Do not be surprised to see similar issues in conflict with your state constitution…If you have been abused and live in Texas have the warrant recalled even if there was a conviction…your case was illegal from the start-
Would a JP Judge conduct a search and seize for alleged bank robber, theft, murder….The issue of animal cruelty is a Class A Misdemeanor or a Felony Sorry folks these JP Judges are BREAKING the Law…wrap your mind around it-it’s a fact!!!

STOP THEM AT THE GATE AND IT SHOULD ALL GO AWAY INCLUDING FROM YOUR RECORDS!!!

A TEXAS JUSTICE OF THE PEACE CAN NOT ISSUE SEIZURE WARRANT

[Bloggers note-This is written like a brief…the copy below is there because you may not realize the title is a link to a PDF-go there for a better read…Send the PDF out]

TEXAS JUSTICE OF THE PEACE
CAN NOT
ISSUE A “SEIZURE” WARRANT

As a matter of law, the “Warrant For Animal Seizure” issued by “layman non-lawyer” Justices
of The Peace completely violates the constitutionally protected and guaranteed rights of Texas animal owners, especially under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution.

As a matter of law, “layman non-lawyer” Justices Of The Peace have NO “legal” power, authority, or jurisdiction to issue ANY “SEIZURE” warrant to obtain evidence
of a criminal offense. As a matter of law, “layman non-lawyer” Justices Of The Peace have NO
“legal” power, authority, or jurisdiction to issue ANY warrant to “search for or seize” any property or items of evidence of a criminal offense, especially when counties have District Court Judges, County Court At Law Judges, and County Judges who are “attorneys licensed with the state” from which criminal “SEARCH / SEIZE” warrants may be “legally” obtained.
LAYMAN NON-LAWYER JUSTICE OF THE PEACE AND ISSUANCE OF A “SEIZURE” WARRANT
(1) According to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure § 2.09, a “Justice Of The Peace” is considered a “magistrate”.1
(2) According to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure § 15.01, an ARREST Warrant is issued to
“take” the BODY of a person.2
(3) According to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure § 15.01, as a “magistrate”, a “layman nonlawyer” Justice of The Peace may issue an ARREST Warrant, as a matter of law. As a matter
of law, there is no exclusion of a “Justice of The Peace” from issuing an “ARREST” Warrant,
__________________________________________________________________
1 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure § 2.09. WHO ARE MAGISTRATES. Each of the following officers is a magistrate within the meaning of this Code: “…the justices of the peace,…”
2 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure §15.01. WARRANT OF ARREST. A “warrant of arrest” is a written order from a magistrate, directed to a peace officer or some other person specially named, commanding him to take the body of the person accused of an offense, to be dealt with according to law.
Texas Justice Of The Peace Can NOT Issue A “Seizure” Warrant ~
pg. 1 of 9 pgs.
_____________________________________________________________________

to “take” the BODY of a person.
(4) According to Texas Code Of Criminal Procedure § 18.02(10), a SEARCH / SEIZE Warrant is
issued to “ search for and SEIZE ” PROPERTY and ITEMS constituting evidence of an offense,
or constituting evidence tending to show that a particular person committed an offense.3
(5) According to Texas Code Of Criminal Procedure § 18.01(c),4 a layman non-lawyer Justice of The Peace is NOT a Judge who is “an attorney licensed with the state” therefore can NOT
issue ANY warrant to “search for and seize” ANY PROPERTY and ITEMS constituting
evidence of an offense or constituting evidence tending to show that a particular person
committed an offense. § 18.02(10).
(6) Animals are the “evidence” of an offense of “Animal Cruelty” – which is a “criminal” offense according to Texas Penal Code § 42.09(c)5 – so a warrant to “search for and seize” an animal,
___________________________________________________________________
3 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure § 18.02(10) GROUNDS FOR ISSUANCE. A search warrant may be issued to search for and seize: (10) property or items, except the personal writings by the accused, constituting evidence of an offense or constituting evidence tending to show that a particular person committed an offense; (bold and underline added.)
4 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure § 18.01(c) “…Except as provided by Subsections (d), (i), and (j), ONLY a judge of a municipal court of record or a county court who is an attorney licensed by the State of Texas, a statutory county court judge, a district court judge, a judge of the Court of Criminal Appeals, including the presiding judge, a justice of the Supreme Court of Texas, including the chief justice, or a magistrate with jurisdiction over criminal cases serving a district court may issue warrants under Article 18.02(10).” A layman non-lawyer Justice of The Peace is NOT included as a “judge” who may issue a “warrant” under Article 18.02(10).
(d) ONLY the specifically described property or items set forth in a search warrant issued under Subdivision (10) of Article 18.02 of this code or property, items or contraband enumerated in Subdivisions (1) through (9) or in Subdivision(12) of Article 18.02 of this code may be seized.
A subsequent search warrant may be issued pursuant to Subdivision (10) of Article 18.02 of this code to search the same person, place, or thing subjected to a prior search under Subdivision (10) of Article 18.02 of this code only if the subsequent search warrant is issued by a judge of a district court, a court of appeals, the court of criminal appeals, or the supreme court.
(i) In a county that does not have a judge of a municipal court of record who is an attorney licensed by the state, a county court judge who is an attorney licensed by the state, or a statutory county court judge, any magistrate may issue a search warrant under Subdivision (10) or Subdivision (12) of Article 18.02 of this code. This subsection is not applicable to a subsequent search warrant under Subdivision (10) of Article 18.02 of this code.
(j) Any magistrate who is an attorney licensed by this state may issue a search warrant under Article 18.02(10) to collect a blood specimen from a person who:
(1) is arrested for an offense under Section 49.04, 49.045, 49.05, 49.06, 49.065, 49.07, or 49.08, Penal Code; and
(2) refuses to submit to a breath or blood alcohol test.
(capitals, bold and underline added.)
5 Texas Penal Code § 42.09.(c) An offense under Subsection (a)(2), (3), (4), or (9) is a Class A misdemeanor, except that the offense is a state jail felony if the person has previously been convicted two times under this section, two times under Section 42.092, or one time under this section and one time under Section 42.092. An offense under Subsection (a)(1),Texas Justice Of The Peace Can NOT Issue A “Seizure” Warrant
~ pg. 2 of 9 pgs.

__________________________________________________________________

which is the “evidence” of a criminal offense of animal cruelty, is controlled by Texas Code of
Criminal Procedure § 18.02(10).
(7) According to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure § 18.01(b) “NO search [seize] warrant shall issue for ANY purpose in this state unless sufficient facts are first presented to satisfy the issuing magistrate that probable cause does in fact exist for its issuance.”
(8) According to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure § 18.01(c) a layman non-lawyer Justice of The Peace is NOT a Judge who is “an attorney licensed with the state”:
1. therefore is NOT a “magistrate” who can determine that probable cause exists for the
issuance of a “Warrant” to “SEIZE” an animal.(§ 18.01(b).6
2. therefore is NOT a “magistrate” who can issue a warrant to “search for and seize”
property or items of evidence of an offense (§ 18.02(10)).

AS A MATTER OF LAW

(1) As a matter of “law”, in the state of Texas, a layman non-lawyer “Justice Of The Peace”, MAY issue an ARREST Warrant. (§ 15.01).
(2) As a matter of “law”, in the state of Texas, a layman non-lawyer “Justice of The Peace”, CAN NOT issue ANY SEARCH / SEIZE Warrant to obtain evidence of a criminal offense,
therefore they can NOT issue ANY “warrant” for the “seizure” of ANY animals, which are the
evidence of an offense of animal cruelty. (§ 18.01(c); § 18.01(b); § 18.02(10)).
VIOLATION OF FOURTH AMENDMENT
“If the initial intrusion is bottomed upon a warrant that fails to mention a
particular object, though the police know its location and intend to seize it, then there
is a violation of the express constitutional requirement of “Warrants . . . particularly
______________________________________________________________________
(5), (6), (7), or (8) is a state jail felony, except that the offense is a felony of the third degree if the person has previously
been convicted two times under this section, two times under Section 42.092, or one time under this section and one time under Section 42.092.
6 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure § 18.01(b): NO search warrant shall issue for ANY purpose in this state unless sufficient facts are first presented to satisfy the issuing magistrate that probable cause does in fact exist for its issuance.
Texas Justice Of The Peace Can NOT Issue A “Seizure” Warrant
~ pg. 3 of 9 pgs.

___________________________________________________________________

describing . . . [the] things to be seized.” Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443,
S.Ct. (1971).
Although layman non-lawyer Justices of The Peace have NO “legal” power, authority, or
jurisdiction to issue ANY warrant to “seize” any animal in the state of Texas, layman non-lawyer Justices of The Peace have been signing and issuing “warrants for animal seizure” in complete violation of both the Constitution of the United States and the Texas Constitution, as well as codified law. Layman non-lawyer Justices of The Peace have been routinely signing and issuing “unconstitutional blanket warrants”7 which completely fail to “particularly describe” ANY particular “object” or thing (animal) to be seized, in direct violation of the protections and requirements set down by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall
issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly
describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
1. Particular: “1. pertaining to a single or specific person, thing, etc. 2. considered separately from others; specific. 3. special; unusual. 4. exacting; fussy. 5. an individual or distinct part, as an item of a list.” (Random House Webster’s Dictionary, second edition, 1996).
2. Describe: “1. To depict in words. 2. to pronounce or name. 3. to draw the outline of.
(Random House Webster’s Dictionary, second edition, 1996).
3. Object: 1. anything that is visible or tangible; 2. a thing or person to which thought or action is directed.” (Random House Webster’s Dictionary, second edition, 1996).
4. Thing: “1. an inanimate object; 8. a living being; creature.” (Random House Webster’s
Dictionary, second edition, 1996).
These wrongfully issued “unconstitutional blanket warrants” also fail to particularly describe “as near as may be” ANY particular “object” or thing (animal) to be seized, in violation of the protections and requirements set down by Article 1, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution:
________________________________________________________________
7 BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY defines a “Blanket Search Warrant” as: “ (1) a single search warrant that authorizes the search of more than one area; (2) an unconstitutional warrant that authorizes the seizure of everything found at a given location, without specifying which items may be seized.”
Texas Justice Of The Peace Can NOT Issue A “Seizure” Warrant ~ pg. 4 of 9 pgs.

“Sec. 9. SEARCHES AND SEIZURES. The people shall be secure in their persons, houses, papers and possessions, from all unreasonable seizures or searches, and no warrant to search any place, or to seize any person or thing, shall issue without
describing them as near as may be, nor without probable cause, supported by oath or
affirmation.”
Layman non-lawyer Justices of The Peace have wrongfully issued warrant after warrant to
seize entire herds of livestock or collections of animals in cases all over Texas which display the complete disregard by layman non-lawyer Justices of The Peace for both the United States and Texas “CONSTITUTIONAL” directives for “legal” warrants. One of the most common phrases which the layman non-lawyer J.P.’s have used includes the generic terms “All Animals Alive, Dead, and Unborn”, which is obvious to even a grade-schooler that this statement does NOT particularly describe ANY specific animal. Justices of The Peace routinely use other generic terms such as “27 horses” ,
“57 Arabian breed studs and mares”, and other “unspecific” terms. Millions of dollars worth of TAXPAYER money has been wrongfully spent in wrongfully “taking” entire herds of livestock or collections of animals from longstanding owners, all at the hand of layman non-lawyer Justices of The Peace. These entire herds of livestock and collections of animals have been wrongfully taken OUT of the “tax-base” and put forever into “non-taxable” status, by layman non-lawyer Justices of The Peace, single handedly.

The language of the Animal Cruelty statutes found in Texas Health & Safety Code § 821.021 et seq., and Texas Penal Code § 42.09 et seq., directs ONLY for “an” animal [singular] and “the” animal [singular].

There is NOTHING in either § 821.021 et seq., or § 42.09 et seq., which provides directives to issue blanket warrants for entire herds of livestock or collections of animals. There is NOTHING in the codified “law” which states if one animal is found to be cruelly treated, you must take them all.

The “LAW” is very clear that ONLY single animals can be considered on an individual basis. These unconstitutional blanket warrants fail to particularly describe any “specific” animal to which any “specific” allegations of animal cruelty can be attached. These warrants fail to describe the sex, approximate age, body coat color, markings, scars, brands, tattoos, or any other defining characteristic, which specifically defines ANY particular animal. These unconstitutional blanket warrants provide NO way for any reasonably minded person to determine “which” particular animal is the subject of any of these invalid “Warrants” in complete violation of the requirements of the Fourth Amendment and Texas Justice Of The Peace Can NOT Issue A “Seizure” Warrant
~ pg. 5 of 9 pgs.

____________________________________________________________

Article 1, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution.
Justices of The Peace in the state of Texas have gotten completely out of hand in disregarding the very limited position they hold. It is time that you Justices of The Peace consider just what you have been accomplishing, under the “guise of law.”

In Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, S.Ct. (1914), through Mr. Justice Day, this
court said: “The effect of the Fourth Amendment is to put the courts of the United States
and Federal officials, in the exercise of their power and authority, under limitations
and restraints as to the exercise of such power and authority, and to forever secure the
people, their persons, houses, papers and effects against all unreasonable searches and
seizures under the guise of law. This protection reaches all alike, whether accused of
crime or not, and the duty of giving to it force and effect is obligatory upon all entrusted
under our Federal system with the enforcement of the laws. The tendency of those who
execute the criminal laws of the country to obtain conviction by means of unlawful
seizures and enforced confessions, the latter often obtained after subjecting accused
persons to unwarranted practices destructive of rights secured by the Federal
Constitution, should find no sanction in the judgments of the courts which are
charged at all times with the support of the Constitution and to which people of all
conditions have a right to appeal for the maintenance of such fundamental rights. . . .
The efforts of the courts and their officials to bring the guilty to punishment,
praiseworthy as they are, are not to be aided by the sacrifice of those great principles
established by years of endeavor and suffering which have resulted in their
embodiment in the fundamental law of the land.”

CONCLUSION

Texas Justices of The Peace have sacrificed the principles of the fundamental law of the land, and the protections and guarantees of the Constitution far too long. Longstanding
animal owners have been routinely raided and their entire herds of livestock and collections of animals “taken” in Nazi like conduct because of illegitimate warrants wrongfully issued by layman non-lawyers who have no “legal” power, authority, or jurisdiction to do so, as a matter of law.

According to Texas Penal Code § 42.09, Animal Cruelty is a criminal offense, therefore Texas
Code of Criminal Procedure § 18.01 et seq., controls the issuance of ANY warrant to “search for and Texas Justice Of The Peace Can NOT Issue A “Seizure” Warrant
~ pg. 6 of 9 pgs.

________________________________________________________

seize” an animal, which is the “evidence” of an offense of animal cruelty.(§ 18.02(10)). Layman nonlawyer Justices of The Peace are NOT a “Judge” who is “an attorney licensed with the state”, therefore according to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure § 18.01(c) these layman non-lawyers have NO “legal” jurisdiction to issue ANY warrant to “search for and seize” ANY property or items of evidence. Layman non-lawyer Justices of The Peace are NOT a “Judge” who is “an attorney licensed with the state”, therefore they have NO “legal” jurisdiction to determine whether ANY probable cause
exists for the issuance of a Warrant For Animal Seizure. (§ 18.01(b)).

It is time for layman non-lawyer Justices of The Peace to stop ignoring and intentionally
disregarding the language of the law which defines the “limits” of their jurisdiction. It is time for layman non-lawyer Justices of The Peace to stop ignoring and intentionally disregarding the codified “legal” procedure for obtaining a “SEIZURE” warrant, according to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure § 18.01(c), §18.01(b), and § 18.02(10). It is time for layman non-lawyer Justices of The Peace to STOP violating the God given rights of animal owning citizens which are protected and guaranteed by the Constitutions of the United States and Texas.

Justices of The Peace are elected “officials” who have a duty and responsibility to abide by the “law” – especially the laws which define the very limited “legal” limitations of your position as a layman non-lawyer Justice of The Peace.

The Taxpayers of Texas are submitting this information to you to demand that you “elected”
officials immediately stop issuing warrants for animal seizure that you have NO “legal” right, power, authority, or jurisdiction to issue. Stop “twisting” codified “law” to commit completely unconstitutional acts against Taxpaying animal owners. The Taxpayers of Texas now demand that you – as a collective body of Justices of The Peace – recall ALL the warrants that you have wrongfully issued for animal seizure, especially your unconstitutional blanket warrants that have “taken” entire herds of livestock and collections of animals from longstanding owners. These warrants were null and void at the moment they were issued, have no power or effect, and must be immediately recalled. The Taxpayers of Texas demand that you immediately issue recall of your illegitimate “warrants” without any delay or obstinate refusal. Taxpayers demand that you immediately recall your “warrants” on your own “order” without any delay and without any more cost to the Taxpayers – simply issue your “recalls” and be done with it. You layman non-lawyer Justices of The Peace have no excuse by which you can deny your duty to recall these unconstitutional blanket warrants. You all have records – or Texas Justice Of The Peace Can NOT Issue A “Seizure” Warrant
~ pg. 7 of 9 pgs.

__________________________________________________________________
should have as a course of proper court conduct – of the cases which you have wrongfully and
unlawfully issued warrants for animal seizure, so there is no excuse for you to not go through your files and “clean up your house.” This is the time to listen to our “constituents – not the time to try to find a “lawyer” who will attempt to play legal gymnastics. The “Warrants” ALL speak for themselves.

It is also time for you Justices of The Peace to fully realize that your unlawful conduct has resulted in millions of dollars of Taxpayer money to be spent for ONLY the benefit of “private citizens.” NO significant governmental interest is shown in ANY of the hundreds of cases of your wrongful “taking” of entire herds of livestock or collections of animals, which is beyond ANY limit of your jurisdiction. The ONLY “interest” which has been served in any of these “animal” cases has been the interest of “private citizens” who are masquerading as animal “rescuers” to whom you have wrongfully “given” all the animals, all paid for by us, the Taxpayers. These “private citizens” routinely impersonate “investigators” when the real truth is that they have NO “official” authority, and ONLY have obtained 501(c)(3) non-profit status, which gives them ONLY the permission to operate “taxfree”.

The “racketeering” activity of these groups of “private citizens” is now coming into much
clearer focus each day. The FBI is investigating many of these wrongful “seizures” of entire herds of livestock and other collections of animals. Many of these groups of “private citizens” are now being made defendants in state and federal courts for their wrongful conduct including RICO violations.

HSUS (Humane Society of the United States) – which most “private citizens” acting under the
guise of “animal rescue” are affiliated with – is reported by CNN to be under investigation for RICO violations. HSUS, along with ASPCA and several other animal “rescue” organizations are named as defendants in Fed. Dist. Courts for RICO and other violations. In December 2012, ASPCA paid Feld Entertainment (Ringling Brothers Circus) $9.3 million as a settlement to avoid going to trial for RICO violations. SPCA is under U.S. Senate investigation for their funding practices and alignment with Quadriga Art. Several “private citizens” guised as animal “rescuers” are now defendants for their illegal and unconstitutional conduct, criminal trespass onto animal owner’s property, and criminal theft
of animal owner’s personal property including images and video which they had no “legal” permission to obtain.

Justices of The Peace in Texas have intentionally used Taxpayers to “subsidize” literal “horse and animal theft.” The real truth about these cases – not the manufactured evidence presented to J. P.s by “private citizens”, who cloak themselves as animal “rescuers, who have a vested interest in being Texas Justice Of The Peace Can NOT Issue A “Seizure” Warrant
~ pg. 8 of 9 pgs.
________________________________________________________
“awarded” these herds and collections of animals – shows that these cases are clearly nothing less than the total miscarriage of justice, perpetrated by layman non-lawyer Justices of The Peace. Layman nonlawyer Justices of The Peace have engaged in nothing less than “government sanctioned horse and animal theft” clearly in the absence of any jurisdiction, leaving longstanding livestock and animal owners destroyed and the Taxpayers picking up the tab. Taxpayers of Texas now demand that this be immediately corrected, and stopped. Your conduct is illegal. You have cost the Taxpayers enough, and
the costs are steadily rising, as victims of this unconstitutional conduct seek relief and restitution through the legal system. We do NOT want to be used to “subsidize” this abuse of your very limited power anymore. Recall your illegitimate “warrants” and let the Judges who are “attorneys licensed with the state” issue “legal” warrants, in the future. Let the courts of competent jurisdiction provide proper due process for ANY allegations of animal cruelty.

Longstanding animal owners have fought individually for their rights as a result of all of this unconstitutional conduct. They should never have had to endure this trampling of their protected and guaranteed rights. The Justices of The Peace must finally realize that the Taxpayers have finally figured out that you have NO “legal” right to continue to participate in ANY animal seizure case. The costs the Taxpayers are having to pay for all of this wrongful conduct is quite alarming, and is being published to the Taxpaying public. There is enough codified law which clearly shows that layman nonlawyer
Justices of The Peace have no “legal” jurisdiction in animal cruelty cases, so there is no
justifiable reason for the Justices of The Peace to force the Taxpayers to engage in costly legal battles to recall your illegitimate warrants, all at Taxpayer expense.

Texas Justices of The Peace – You are being asked to voluntarily excuse yourselves in any cases of alleged animal cruelty, and forward these cases to the District Attorneys, and District Courts – the courts of competent jurisdiction where they belong. Stop wrongfully intruding on the lives and rights of Texas Animal Owners and Taxpayers when you have no jurisdiction to do so:

“The government must PROVE a “significant governmental interest” in infringing on
constitutional rights and even if there is found a significant interest to infringe on the
rights of the person, the government will do so in the least intrusive manner.”
FW/PBS v. DALLAS 493 US 215, 110 S.Ct. 596, 107 L. Ed. 2d 603 – Supreme Court,
1990.”

Respectfully Submitted – “taxpaying” Animal Owners for Justice.
Texas Justice Of The Peace Can NOT Issue A “Seizure” Warrant ~ pg. 9 of 9 pgs.

____________________________________________

Disclaimer connected to this blog and saying this because I do after every post…I stand behind all that research as does the senator who was consulted…Things said are of my opinion ad the opinion of others…Stay tuned and prepare -B

Thanking McDonalds for the chicken wings (by the way even better with blue cheese dressing than the ranch that you provide) and the free Y-fi…never know where you’ll find a blogger-and a blogger busting JP Judges for their bad…Hey this is LAW cut and dry…allowing a JP Judge anywhere near these animal cruelty cases is like hanging out a hangman’s noose on the ‘intended victims-animal owners, after taking property that was not levied, deny jury trials and criminalized animal owners before even hearing he case in a proper court of law…that too they have no say.

Case History- Hoffmann/Lulling:

Hoffmann/Lulling-Marion County JP Judge Lex Jones issued the search warrant, heard the case as a Class ‘A’ Misdemeanor for property valued over $207,000.00 on a Criminal Docket Judgment well BEYOND the ten day period as stipulated by LAW…No interpreter provided for deaf defendant Lulling thru the entire ordeal beginning with 3 days of warrant-less searches [bloggers note-practically the entire sheriff dept and many others participated in the warrantless searches -considering that no lawyer, JP Judge Lex Jones is not authorized to issue a search and seize warrant ALL visits on the property were illegal]…and a seizure where the deputy serving the warrant, now Sheriff McKnight served the illegal warrant and forced the press on the property despite the OBJECTION by BOTH Hoffmann/Lulling at the gate, at the time they were served the warrant…The press now in State District Court, Judge Rolston against London Broadcasting, Raycom (ruling for Raycom – CPA for their TRESPASS-HELLO!!! Objection filed for reconsideration…the Act can NOT be used for protection against Criminal ACTIVITY trespass is criminal activity…AND Marshall News Messenger who documented the confusion and objection at the gate…

APPEALED AND SENT TO Marion County Court, Judge Phil Parker…The case MIRACULASILLY became CIVIL…the impossible became possible because these judges are layman nonlawyers not trained in  the law. County  Judge Phil Parker gave all the property away and failed to return animals, as there was no conviction…charges were dropped before the first hearing in JP Court…there was no reason to waste tax dollars for a FAKE case of animal cruelty…They knew it, there is no doubt in anyone’s mind as at the conclusion of the JP Court hearing the court appointed attorneys dropped Hoffmann/Lulling stating it was a civil hearing and not criminal…well what the Hell was it?!?

It was illegal from the 3 days of unwarranted searches to the illegal warranted search, to the illegal hearing in the JP Court (2 hearings and judgment went beyond the 10 day period as stipulated by law)) to the illegal hearing in the County Court (TX Code 26.258-Phil Parker had no jurisdiction to hear the case) ~DENIED trial by jury!!!

Hoffmann/Lulling appealed to the Appellate Court in Texarkana-Get this, was a trial de novo [ILLEGAL didn’t seem to matter] they refused the case stating not their jurisdiction.

Now that truly is funny when the two previous courts had no jurisdiction and STOLE all the animals…1/2 NOW DEAD the animal owners remain distraught to this day and suffering from symptoms of PTSD. And the ppellate court wouldn’t accept the case for lack of jurisdiction!!!

Hoffmann/Lulling have filed Federal suit; January, 2012 for the civil liberty abuse, and more…awaiting trial before a jury. Filled in state court against the media for trespass, trespass during a search and seize, invasion of privacy and theft of photos (Raycom, London Broadcasting and Marshall News Messenger) Judge Rolston

___________________________

It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat. -Theodore Roosevelt

Other case histories will be documented in the following weeks-Don’t miss the most distressing and shameful cases in the US!!!

The c

Advertisements

~ by topcatsroar on September 26, 2013.

2 Responses to “The Justice of the Peace Forges his Own Brand of Law in Texas”

  1. There ya go! Many state constitutions it appears conflict with the U S Constitution!!! WOOHOO! Call it like it is! Spoon feed when necessary!

    • Apparently in Texas you HAVE to spoon fed this info…You think he’d get away with a murder investigation and hearing the case, LOL!!! And they are in such shock when you point this out…already one case reported it as case law…hat’s it take…if they never levied the property the it couldn’t be a civil matter…No matter the docket, it was a criminal action and JP Judges are off their rockers!!! ALL victims, animal owners, taxpayer whether in Texas or not need to file complaints!!! -B

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: