ZOO WARS-The USDA is Overstepping their Boundaries Once Again

The USDA is Overstepping their Boundaries Once Again because of an Animal Rights Petition and something tells me this STINKS of Carole Lewis Baskin (BCR-Big Cat Rescue/HSUS) once again with her insane reasoning that there is something wrong with human contact with an animal (Although she herself has the pleasure and privilege).

To have these animals in captivity means protecting them from Extinction-Extension is FOREVER GONE!!!

If we are protecting these animals in captivity then it is extremely important that the animals understand captivity with humans and no better way to bond. An animal accustom to human contact receives better care and most certainly better vet care. Years has been spent studying captive use and those bonded have a better survival rate than not, well adjusted and live longer lives.

Please respond to the following public opinion request from the USDA/APHIS!!! It affects both big cats and primates-somehow now grouped together. This Baskin woman along with her Nazi buddies of shame, need to get a grip…ALL ARE ANIMAL RIGHTS EXTREMISTS =some with animals…Fund for Animals is HSUS…HSUS bought Fund for Animals-I could be wrong but seems to me I ran across a document recently  about that…My question is if they hate these animals so much what kind of care are they really providing?!? Baskin needs to give up those animals to people who can properly provide OH, WAIT, I forgot she needs you money from the money she collects at the gate and donations she claims is for their care-she’s so full of BULLSHIT…


Another comment from Joe Exotic-Baskin/HSUS main target…I swear the woman is possessed…

“This is the most stupid thing I have seen the USDA try and pull ever. This is nothing more than a push from the Animal Rights people, it has nothing to do with helping or saving animals. Lets look at some facts
1- Every AZA and private zoo pulls their young to hand raise it, why? because they are endangered and the chance of them dying or getting killed staying in the compound with their mom is 80% worse.
2- Public contact is in fact the best way to educate the public and get them to care about what is really going on in their natural habitat.
3- You want more people killed by big cats, bears and primates, let them grow up in a cage with no human interaction and you will have nothing more than a killing machine. Look at the facts. This would be nothing more than a wild caught tiger, lion, bear or primate in a cage that hates people, scared and dangerous vs an animal raised by humans and is somewhat tamer and less dangerous.

If the USDA just wants to make all these animals go extinct just shoot them all and then call yourselves the animal welfare act tomorrow.

Let the people and the professionals who do this for a living have care for the animals they live their lives for not the people with an agenda to force them off the planet in the name of animal rights.”


Petition to Amend Animal Welfare Act Regulations: Prohibit Public

Contact with Big Cats, Bears, and Nonhuman Primates

This Proposed Rule document was issued by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)




We are notifying the public that the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service has received a petition requesting amendments to the Animal Welfare Act regulations and standards, including to prohibit licensees from allowing individuals, with certain exceptions, from coming into direct or physical contact with big cats, bears, or nonhuman primates of any age, to define the term “sufficient distance,” and to prohibit the public handling of young or immature big cats, bears, and nonhuman primates and the separation of such animals from their dams before the species-typical age of weaning absent medical necessity. We are making this petition available to the public and soliciting comments regarding the petition and any additional issues we should take into account as we consider this petition.


We will consider all comments that we receive on or before October 4, 2013.


You may submit comments by either of the following methods:

Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may be viewed at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012-0107 or in our reading room, which is located in room 1141 of the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.

For Further Information Contact

Dr. Barbara Kohn, DVM, Senior Staff Officer, USDA, APHIS, Animal Care, 4700 River Road Unit 84, Riverdale, MD 20737-1234; (301) 851-3751.

Supplementary Information


The Animal Welfare Act (AWA, 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.) authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to promulgate standards and other requirements governing the humane handling, care, treatment, and transportation of certain animals by dealers, research facilities, exhibitors, operators of auction sales, and carriers and intermediate handlers. The Secretary has delegated the responsibility for enforcing the AWA to the Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). Within APHIS, the responsibility for administering the AWA has been delegated to the Deputy Administrator for Animal Care. Regulations and standards established under the AWA are contained in 9 CFR parts 1, 2, and 3. Part 1 contains definitions for terms used in parts 2 and 3; part 2 contains licensing and registration regulations, regulations specific to research facilities, and regulations governing veterinary care, animal identification, recordkeeping, access for inspection, confiscation of animals, and handling among other requirements; and part 3 contains specific standards for the humane handling, care, treatment, and transportation of categories of animals covered under the AWA. Currently, part 3 consists of subparts A through F, which contain specific standards for dogs and cats, guinea pigs and hamsters, rabbits, nonhuman primates, marine mammals, and general standards for warmblooded animals not otherwise specified in previous subparts, respectively.

Within part 2, § 2.131 generally contains provisions for licensee qualifications, training, careful handling, rest periods, attendants, climatic conditions, and public exhibition. Paragraph (b)(1) requires that all animals be handled in a manner that prevents trauma, behavioral stress, physical harm, or unnecessary discomfort to them. Paragraph (c)(1) places conditions on the public exhibition of animals. It requires that during public exhibition, all animals must be handled with sufficient distance and/or barriers between the animal and the public so as to ensure the safety of the animals and the public. Paragraphs (c)(2), (c)(3), and (c)(4) require that performing animals be given rest periods, that young or immature animals cannot be exposed to rough or excessive public handling or exhibited for periods of time that would be inconsistent with their health and well-being, and that drugs, such as tranquilizers, cannot be used to facilitate public handling of any animals. Paragraph (d) requires that animals be exhibited only for periods of time and under conditions consistent with their health and well-being, that responsible, knowledgeable, and identifiable employees or attendants be present at all times during public contact with animals, and specifically requires that dangerous animals such as lions, tigers, wolves, bears, or elephants, be under the direct control and supervision of an experienced handler during public exhibition.

APHIS has received a petition (1) requesting that we amend the regulations in part 2 to explicitly prohibit licensees from allowing persons, with some exceptions, from coming into direct physical contact with any big cats, bears, and nonhuman primates of any age. The petition states that the current handling regulations in 9 CFR part 2 allow licensees the opportunity to engage in animal exhibition practices via public contact venues, such as interactive sessions and photographic opportunities, and that these activities place these animals at risk of harm, threaten public safety, undermine conservation efforts, and encourage irresponsible breeding. The petitioners contend that the existing handling regulations are difficult to enforce, subjective, and inconsistently applied. The petitioners propose specific regulatory language that would, if incorporated into the regulations, amend § 2.131 to eliminate the possibility of direct physical contact with big cats, bears, and nonhuman primates by any individual, other than trained licensee employees, licensed veterinarians, and veterinary students under the supervision of a licensed veterinarian; define “sufficient distance” under paragraph (c)(1) of § 2.131; and prevent the separation of young or immature big cats, bears, or nonhuman primates from their dams before the species-typical age of weaning unless medically necessary. The petitioners also suggest revisions to 9 CFR part 3 to ensure that the sections containing specific standards for the handling of nonhuman primates are consistent with the regulatory changes they propose in § 2.131.

We are making this petition available to the public and soliciting comments to help determine what action, if any, we should take in response to this request. The petition and any comments submitted are available for review as indicated underADDRESSESabove. We welcome all comments on the issues outlined in the petition and the supporting declarations. In addition, we invite responses to the following questions:

  • Are there circumstances under which public contact with young big cats, bears, and nonhuman primatesmay be done without risk of harm to the animals or to the public?
  • Should exhibitors and dealers be required to keep additional records (beyond those already required) regarding big cats, bears, and nonhuman primates? If so, what kinds of information should be required to be kept?
  • Should exhibitors and dealers be required to identify big cats, bears, and nonhuman primates by means of tattoos, microchips, retinal scans, or the like?

We encourage the submission of scientific data, studies, or research to support your comments and position, including scientific data or research that supports any industry or professional standards that pertain to the humane treatment of big cats, bears, and nonhuman primates. We also invite data on the costs and benefits associated with any recommendations. We will consider all comments and recommendations we receive.


7 U.S.C. 2131-2159; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.7.

Done in Washington, DC, this 31st day of July 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-18874 Filed 8-2-13; 8:45 am]


(1) Petitioners include the Humane Society of the United States, World Wildlife Fund, The Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries, The International Fund for Animal Welfare, Born Free USA, The Fund for Animals, Big Cat Rescue, and the Detroit Zoological Society.


Disclaimer connected to the blog…Things said are of my opinion and the opinion of others-Stay Tuned  -B


~ by topcatsroar on August 8, 2013.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: